In Harm's Way: Toxic Threats to Child Development
A Report by
Greater Boston Physicians for Social Responsibility
May 2000
- A pdf file of this entire report
is available online at http://www.igc.org/psr/ihw.htm
- See Endorsements of the report from Public Health Scientists at
http://www.igc.org/psr/scientists-endorse-ihw.htm
Chapter 6: Known and Suspected Developmental Neurotoxicants
Fluoride
Since the 1950's, in many communities throughout
the US and other areas of the world, fluoride has been added to community
drinking water supplies with the intention of reducing tooth decay. Controversy
about the safety of that practice centers around concerns about increased
risks of tooth staining and brittleness (dental fluorosis), bone brittleness
(skeletal fluorosis), bone cancer, hormone disruption (melatonin), premature
puberty, and altered neurological development. In addition, some critics
argue that fluoridating the water supply has a minimal impact on tooth
decay. The practice has been staunchly defended by the American Dental
Association and heralded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
as one of the major public health success stories of the 20th century.
We do not intend to review the entire controversy here. Recent reviews
are found elsewhere (149 150 151). Rather, here we comment briefly on
concerns about neurodevelopmental impacts of prenatal exposure to fluoride.
The US EPA sets a Recommended Maximum Contaminant Level of 4.0 ppm fluoride
in drinking water. The National Institute for Dental Research considers
fluoride at 1 PPM optimal for preventing dental caries. This level may
be exceeded in some communities. Additional sources of fluoride, including
topical fluoride treatments, fluoride tablets, and fluoride toothpaste,
add to the total fluoride burden.
In an animal study, pregnant rats were given 0.13 mg sodium fluoride/kg
by injection on 9 separate occasions from days 14-18 or 17-19 during pregnancy
(152). Offspring of treated animals and controls were monitored by videotape
that was then computer-analyzed in order to quantify various behavioral
characteristics. Offspring exposed to fluoride on days 17-19 of pregnancy
showed significant hyperactivity. They tended to move from one activity
to another more frequently than unexposed animals. This study has been
criticized for using excessive fluoride exposures. The authors respond
by noting that the blood levels of fluoride in the treated animals were
similar to the levels measured in people who are exposed through fluoridated
water. Another criticism centered on the lack of biological plausibility
that the results would differ in the two groups exposed at similar times
during pregnancy (153). The authors, however, point out that vulnerable
developmental stages change rapidly during this time window and argue
that the findings are entirely plausible (154).
Another study found that the offspring of rats given 5, 15, 50 PPM fluoride
in drinking water during pregnancy and lactation had significantly elevated
acetylcholinesterase levels when tested at 80 days of age (155). Maternal
acetylcholinesterase levels were also increased. Though not measured in
this study, a likely result of elevated acetylcholinesterase activity
is decreased acetylcholine levels. As we have noted, the enzyme, acetylcholinesterase,
and the neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, play important roles in brain
development. Changes in the concentrations of any neurotransmitter during
development may have permanent neurological consequences. The largest
effect was seen at 5 PPM, decreasing at the higher levels.
Two reports from China identify significantly lower childhood IQs in communities
where fluoride exposure is elevated. In one community, where drinking
water naturally contains 4.12 PPM fluoride, IQs were significantly lower
than in a nearby community with fluoride levels at 0.91 PPM (average IQ
98 vs. 105) (156). This difference persisted when the study population
was controlled for parental educational level. The authors describe similar
occupations, living standards, and social customs in the two communities.
The ecologic design of this study imposes some limits on the conclusions
that may be drawn since the exposure (fluoride) and outcome (IQ) were
compared on a population-wide basis without any attempt to associate individual
fluoride exposure levels with individual IQs. Nonetheless, an IQ shift
of 7 points in an entire population has large population-wide implications,
as well as impacting individual members, and these results deserve close
attention.
In the other study, investigators used dental fluorosis and urinary fluoride
levels to stratify children into four quartiles (157). Elevated fluoride
exposures were associated with decreased IQs in this population. That
is, the distribution of IQ scores in children in each quartile of fluoride
exposure shifted progressively downward as the fluoride exposures increased.
Conclusion
Studies in animals and human populations suggest
that fluoride exposure, at levels that are experienced by a significant
proportion of the population whose drinking water is fluoridated, may
have adverse impacts on the developing brain. Though no final conclusions
may be reached from available data, the findings are provocative and of
significant public health concern. Perhaps most surprising is the relative
sparseness of data addressing the central question of whether or not this
chemical, which is intentionally added to drinking water, may interfere
with normal brain development and function. Focused research should address
this important matter urgently.
References:
149 Hileman B. Fluoridation of water. Chem Eng News 66:26-42,
1988.
150 Connett P. Fluoride: a statement of concern. Waste
Not #459. Canton NY.
151 CDC. Fluoridation of drinking water to prevent dental
caries. MMWR 48:986-993, 1999.
152 Mullenix PJ, Denbesten PK, Schunior A, Kernan W.
Neurotoxicity of sodium fluoride in rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol17(2):169-177,
1995.
153 Ross J, Daston G. Letter to the editor. Neurotoxicol
Teratol 17(6):685-686, 1995.
154 Mullenix P, Denbesten P, Schunior A, Kernan W. Reply.
Neurotoxicol Teratol 17(6):687-688, 1995.
155 Zhao XL, Wu JH. Actions of sodium fluoride on acetylcholinesterase
activities in rats. Biomed Environ Sci 11(1):1-6, 1998.
156 Zhao LB Liang GH, Zhang DN, et al. Effect of a high
fluoride water supply on children's intelligence. Fluoride 29(4):190-192,
1996.
157 Li XS, Zhi JL, Gao RO, Effect of fluoride exposure
on intelligence in children. Fluoride 28(4):189-192, 1995.
© 2000 Greater Boston Physicians for Social Responsibility
(GBPSR)
GBPSR grants permission to reprint properly credited excerpts from this
book.